NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Teachers1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations1
Showing 1 to 15 of 50 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Pervaiz Yaseeni; Fahim Rahimi; Fareed Sahil – Journal of Research Initiatives, 2024
Academic writing is a salient skill for medical students all over the world. Academic writing starts with composing effective paragraphs, laying the foundation for students' advancement in writing during college. This study investigated common mistakes in English paragraph writing committed by the first-year medical students of the Medicine…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Medical Students, Paragraph Composition, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wenting Chen; Jianwu Gao – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2024
While the importance of the peer feedback in second or foreign language (L2 or FL) classrooms in higher education has been increasingly recognized, empirical research on discussing peer feedback literacy from the perspective of community-based academic writing is very much in its infancy. Informed by the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework, this…
Descriptors: Inquiry, Community Education, Feedback (Response), Computer Mediated Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Man, Deliang; Chau, Meng Huat; Kong, Beibei – Educational Psychology, 2021
Teacher feedback is of little use without student engagement. Few studies have, however, empirically considered how direct interventions may enhance student engagement with feedback. This study explored whether and to what extent the use of a rebuttal-writing task can serve as a learning tool to promote student engagement with teacher feedback.…
Descriptors: Learner Engagement, Feedback (Response), Writing Instruction, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wu, Yong; Schunn, Christian D. – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2021
Implementing peer feedback in revisions is a complex process involving first planning to fix problems and then actual implementing feedback through revisions. Both phases are influenced by features of the peer feedback itself, but potentially in different ways, and yet prior research has not examined their separate role in planning or the…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation, Program Implementation, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Andrew J. Cavanaugh; Liyan Song – Journal of Response to Writing, 2021
Instructors often use text-based methods when giving feedback to students on their papers. With the development of audio recording technologies, audio feedback has become an increasingly popular alternative to written feedback. This study analyzed five instructors' commenting patterns of both written and audio feedback. The five instructors, who…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Assignments, Writing Teachers, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Law, Sweety; Baer, Amy – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2020
This article reports an initiative to improve student writing by incorporating technology-based structured peer review in the revision process. Although the most important step of writing, the revision step, is overlooked by students for several reasons. We describe a successful 10-week long intervention with students from upper-level…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Writing Evaluation, Peer Evaluation, Technology Uses in Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Leanne Havis – Journal of Response to Writing, 2022
Metacognition emphasizes an awareness and understanding of one's thoughts and cognitive processes, along with management of cognition through multiple strategies, including organizing, monitoring, and adapting. Before students can truly become effective writers, they must develop an appreciation for the amount of planning, organization, and…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, College Freshmen, Writing Assignments, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn; Safron L. Milne; Michael N. Petterson; Jasen Chen; Ginger V. Shultz – Written Communication, 2024
Peer review is useful for providing students with formative feedback, yet it is used less frequently in STEM classrooms and for supporting writing-to-learn (WTL). While research indicates the benefits of incorporating peer review into classrooms, less research is focused on students' perceptions thereof. Such research is important as it speaks to…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Feedback (Response), STEM Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Long, Ziyu; Williams, Elizabeth A. – Communication Teacher, 2021
Courses: Organizational Communication; any advanced communication course that can benefit from using a case study approach. Objectives: This semester-long case study assignment asks students to write a case study around an organizational communication issue based on their empirical data collection of a real organization. Students are expected to…
Descriptors: Organizational Communication, Case Method (Teaching Technique), Case Studies, Writing Assignments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Bruce Bowles – Journal of Response to Writing, 2020
In spite of a host of scholarship pertaining to response and the contexts that surround our response practices, few have studied how everyday classroom texts may inform students' interpretations of teachers' written feedback on their writing. This article examines the results from case studies of six students across two first-year composition…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing (Composition), Freshman Composition, Context Effect
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Voet, Michiel; Gielen, Mario; Boelens, Ruth; De Wever, Bram – European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2018
Criticizing the common approach of supporting peer assessment through providing assessors with an explication of assessment criteria, recent insights on peer assessment call for support focusing on assessees, who often assume a passive role of receivers of feedback. Feedback requests, which require assessees to formulate their specific needs for…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation, College Freshmen, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vögelin, Cristina; Jansen, Thorben; Keller, Stefan D.; Möller, Jens – Language Learning Journal, 2021
This experimental study examined the influence of vocabulary and spelling on teachers' perceptions of English as a second language (ESL) essays. Sixty-nine pre-service teachers from Switzerland and Germany rated four upper-intermediate ESL argumentative essays and provided written comments on strengths and weaknesses of the student compositions.…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction, Vocabulary, Spelling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Yi-Chun Christine Yang – Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 2024
This study examines the relationship between EFL students' noticing and three written feedback strategies. The convenience sampling method was adopted and four intact classes were randomly assigned into four groups: the model, the error correction, the reformulation, and the control groups. After the completion of picture-cued writing tasks as…
Descriptors: Grammar, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Error Correction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Walls, Jill K.; Eby, Kelly E. – Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 2020
This study sought to better understand students' experiences with instructor feedback on writing assignments. Undergraduate students (n = 162) completed an online survey about the frequency, type, and nature of feedback they received from instructors, their feedback preferences, their satisfaction with feedback, and their use of feedback. Findings…
Descriptors: Student Experience, Preferences, Feedback (Response), Writing Assignments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Reynders, Gil; Lantz, Juliette; Ruder, Suzanne M.; Stanford, Courtney L.; Cole, Renée S. – International Journal of STEM Education, 2020
Background: Process skills such as critical thinking and information processing are commonly stated outcomes for STEM undergraduate degree programs, but instructors often do not explicitly assess these skills in their courses. Students are more likely to develop these crucial skills if there is constructive alignment between an instructor's…
Descriptors: STEM Education, Critical Thinking, Thinking Skills, Undergraduate Students
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4