Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Guidelines | 2 |
| Writing Processes | 2 |
| Authors | 1 |
| Check Lists | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Information Science | 1 |
| Information Science Education | 1 |
| Letters (Correspondence) | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Publications | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| College & Research Libraries | 1 |
Publication Type
| Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
| Guides - General | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| Virginia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLongmeier, Meris Mandernach; Fagan, Jody Condit – College & Research Libraries, 2021
Query letters may offer an effective way to increase author engagement in the scholarly communication process, yet they are not a common practice in library and information science (LIS). A survey and interviews were conducted with LIS journal editors to explore experiences, attitudes, and opinions concerning query letters. Results indicate query…
Descriptors: Information Science, Information Science Education, Letters (Correspondence), Authors
Zacher, Candace M. – 1987
This guide to the development of effective documentation for users of computer software begins by identifying five types of documentation, i.e., training manuals, user guides, tutorials, on-screen help comments, and troubleshooting manuals. Six steps in the development process are then outlined and briefly described: (1) planning and preparation;…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Computer Software, Evaluation Criteria, Guidelines
