Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Source
| Contemporary Educational… | 1 |
| Education and Information… | 1 |
| Grantee Submission | 1 |
| Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Author
| Allen, Laura K. | 2 |
| McNamara, Danielle S. | 2 |
| Snow, Erica L. | 2 |
| Carmen Köhler | 1 |
| Johannes Hartig | 1 |
| Ke Li | 1 |
| Lulu Lun | 1 |
| Pingping Hu | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 4 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ke Li; Lulu Lun; Pingping Hu – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
Amid the ongoing discussion about the potential of LLMs (Large Language Models) to facilitate language learning, there has been a broad spectrum of views in academia. However, little is known about the different viewpoints of students and what contributes to these differences. In light of this, this study adopts Q-methodology, a mixed-methods…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Language Attitudes, Affordances, Artificial Intelligence
Carmen Köhler; Johannes Hartig – Contemporary Educational Technology, 2024
Since ChatGPT-3.5 has been available to the public, the potentials and challenges regarding chatbot usage in education have been widely discussed. However, little evidence exists whether and for which purposes students even apply generative AI tools. The first main purpose of the present study was to develop and test scales that assess students'…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, College Students, Natural Language Processing, Technology Uses in Education
Allen, Laura K.; Snow, Erica L.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2016
A commonly held belief among educators, researchers, and students is that high-quality texts are easier to read than low-quality texts, as they contain more engaging narrative and story-like elements. Interestingly, these assumptions have typically failed to be supported by the literature on writing. Previous research suggests that higher quality…
Descriptors: Role, Writing (Composition), Natural Language Processing, Hypothesis Testing
Allen, Laura K.; Snow, Erica L.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2016
A commonly held belief among educators, researchers, and students is that high-quality texts are easier to read than low-quality texts, as they contain more engaging narrative and story-like elements. Interestingly, these assumptions have typically failed to be supported by the literature on writing. Previous research suggests that higher quality…
Descriptors: Role, Writing (Composition), Natural Language Processing, Hypothesis Testing

Peer reviewed
Direct link
