NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Siantuba, Jackson; Nkhata, Leonard; de Jong, Ton – Smart Learning Environments, 2023
This study sought to develop and evaluate an online module based on inquiry learning with digital laboratories, which was intended to address students' misconceptions in a science domain. In a quasi-experimental design, 171 first-year students in a higher education introductory physics course on circular motion were as their existing groups…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, College Science, Introductory Courses, Physics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Odom, Arthur L.; Bell, Clare V. – Science Teacher, 2019
In 1827, Robert Brown noticed pollen suspended in water bouncing around erratically. It wasn't until 1905 that Albert Einstein provided an acceptable explanation of the phenomenon (Kac 1947): Brownian motion is the random movement of particles (e.g., pollen) in a fluid (liquid or gas) as a result of collisions with atoms and molecules. Movement of…
Descriptors: Science Instruction, Molecular Structure, Motion, Scientific Concepts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Sobieszczuk-Nowicka, Ewa; Rybska, Eliza; Jarmuzek, Joanna; Adamiec, Malgorzata; Chylenska, Zofia – Education Sciences, 2018
Problems with understanding concepts and mechanisms connected to plant movements have been diagnosed among biology students. Alternative conceptions in understanding these phenomena are marginally studied. The diagnosis was based on a sample survey of university students and their lecturers, which was quantitatively and qualitatively exploratory…
Descriptors: Biology, Science Instruction, College Science, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Douglas, Scott S.; Aiken, John M.; Lin, Shih-Yin; Greco, Edwin F.; Alicea-Muñoz, Emily; Schatz, Michael F. – Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2017
We examine changes in students' rating behavior during a semester-long sequence of peer evaluation laboratory exercises in an introductory mechanics course. We perform a quantitative analysis of the ratings given by students to peers' physics lab reports, and conduct interviews with students. We find that peers persistently assign higher ratings…
Descriptors: Science Instruction, Science Laboratories, Peer Evaluation, Mechanics (Physics)