Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| Surveys | 2 |
| Working Hours | 2 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
| Costs | 1 |
| Employment | 1 |
| Employment Opportunities | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| US Department of Agriculture | 1 |
Author
| Carlson, Barbara | 1 |
| DeCamillis, Mason | 1 |
| Defnet, Amy | 1 |
| Dotter, Dallas | 1 |
| Freedman, Stephen | 1 |
| Hamilton, Gayle | 1 |
| Hartnack, Julie | 1 |
| Hill, W. Leland | 1 |
| Mabli, James | 1 |
| Paxton, Nora | 1 |
| Schochet, Peter | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| Delaware | 1 |
| Georgia | 1 |
| Illinois | 1 |
| Kansas | 1 |
| Kentucky | 1 |
| Mississippi | 1 |
| Vermont | 1 |
| Virginia | 1 |
| Washington | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textDotter, Dallas; Mabli, James; Carlson, Barbara; Hartnack, Julie; DeCamillis, Mason; Paxton, Nora; Defnet, Amy; Schochet, Peter; Hamilton, Gayle; Freedman, Stephen – US Department of Agriculture, 2022
This technical supplement to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Employment and Training (E&T) evaluation final reports presents details of the technical approach used for creating analysis variables and estimating impacts of treatment group services on outcomes, including employment, earnings, and SNAP participation. It also…
Descriptors: Pilot Projects, Program Implementation, Cost Effectiveness, Barriers
Hill, W. Leland – 1979
A questionnaire was sent to the chief academic office of 20 universities to determine a fair and uniform workload for faculty at Central Missouri State University (CMSU). The mean undergraduate teaching load reported by the 18 responding institutions was 11.89 contact hours/week, as compared with 15.6 contact hours/week reported by CMSU faculty.…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Faculty Workload, Higher Education
