Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Science Education | 2 |
| Programming | 2 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| Comprehension | 1 |
| Evidence Based Practice | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Literature Reviews | 1 |
| Novices | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Protocol Analysis | 1 |
| Teaching Methods | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| ACM Transactions on Computing… | 2 |
Author
| Luxton-Reilly, Andrew | 2 |
| Denny, Paul | 1 |
| Indriasari, Theresia Devi | 1 |
| Settle, Amber | 1 |
| Whalley, Jacqueline | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Whalley, Jacqueline; Settle, Amber; Luxton-Reilly, Andrew – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2023
Debugging is a core skill required by programmers, yet we know little about how to effectively teach the process of debugging. The challenges of learning debugging are compounded for novices who lack experience and are still learning the tools they need to program effectively. In this work, we report a case study in which we used a think-aloud…
Descriptors: Protocol Analysis, Novices, Troubleshooting, Programming
Indriasari, Theresia Devi; Luxton-Reilly, Andrew; Denny, Paul – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2020
Peer review is the standard process within academia for maintaining publication quality, but it is also widely employed in other settings, such as education and industry, for improving work quality and for generating actionable feedback to content authors. For example, in the software industry peer review of program source code--or peer code…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Programming, Higher Education, Computer Science Education

Peer reviewed
Direct link
