Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Automation | 2 |
| Computer Science Education | 2 |
| Feedback (Response) | 2 |
| Grading | 2 |
| Programming | 2 |
| Assignments | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Concept Mapping | 1 |
| Content Analysis | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Error Correction | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| ACM Transactions on Computing… | 2 |
Author
| Babes-Vroman Monica | 1 |
| Haldeman, Georgiana | 1 |
| Marcus Messer | 1 |
| Miaojing Shi | 1 |
| Michael Kölling | 1 |
| Neil C. C. Brown | 1 |
| Nguyen, Thu D. | 1 |
| Tjang, Andrew | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMarcus Messer; Neil C. C. Brown; Michael Kölling; Miaojing Shi – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2024
We conducted a systematic literature review on automated grading and feedback tools for programming education. We analysed 121 research papers from 2017 to 2021 inclusive and categorised them based on skills assessed, approach, language paradigm, degree of automation, and evaluation techniques. Most papers assess the correctness of assignments in…
Descriptors: Automation, Grading, Feedback (Response), Programming
Haldeman, Georgiana; Babes-Vroman Monica; Tjang, Andrew; Nguyen, Thu D. – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2021
Autograding systems are being increasingly deployed to meet the challenges of teaching programming at scale. Studies show that formative feedback can greatly help novices learn programming. This work extends an autograder, enabling it to provide formative feedback on programming assignment submissions. Our methodology starts with the design of a…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Grading, Automation
