Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Science Education | 2 |
| Content Analysis | 2 |
| Programming | 2 |
| Attitudes | 1 |
| Automation | 1 |
| Behavior | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Problem Solving | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| ACM Transactions on Computing… | 2 |
Author
| Alexandron, Giora | 1 |
| Armoni, Michal | 1 |
| Gordon, Michal | 1 |
| Harel, David | 1 |
| Marcus Messer | 1 |
| Miaojing Shi | 1 |
| Michael Kölling | 1 |
| Neil C. C. Brown | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMarcus Messer; Neil C. C. Brown; Michael Kölling; Miaojing Shi – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2024
We conducted a systematic literature review on automated grading and feedback tools for programming education. We analysed 121 research papers from 2017 to 2021 inclusive and categorised them based on skills assessed, approach, language paradigm, degree of automation, and evaluation techniques. Most papers assess the correctness of assignments in…
Descriptors: Automation, Grading, Feedback (Response), Programming
Alexandron, Giora; Armoni, Michal; Gordon, Michal; Harel, David – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2014
In this article, we discuss the possible connection between the programming language and the paradigm behind it, and programmers' tendency to adopt an external or internal perspective of the system they develop. Based on a qualitative analysis, we found that when working with the visual, interobject language of live sequence charts (LSC),…
Descriptors: Programming Languages, Attitudes, Usability, Problem Solving
