Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Science Education | 2 |
| Correlation | 2 |
| Programming Languages | 2 |
| Biofeedback | 1 |
| Career Readiness | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Databases | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| ACM Transactions on Computing… | 2 |
Author
| Bonita Sharif | 1 |
| Cole S. Peterson | 1 |
| Kölling, Michael | 1 |
| McCall, Davin | 1 |
| Michael D. Dodd | 1 |
| Niloofar Mansoor | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkNiloofar Mansoor; Cole S. Peterson; Michael D. Dodd; Bonita Sharif – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2024
Background and Context: Understanding how a student programmer solves different task types in different programming languages is essential to understanding how we can further improve teaching tools to support students to be industry-ready when they graduate. It also provides insight into students' thought processes in different task types and…
Descriptors: Biofeedback, Eye Movements, Computer Science Education, Programming Languages
McCall, Davin; Kölling, Michael – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2019
The types of programming errors that novice programmers make and struggle to resolve have long been of interest to researchers. Various past studies have analyzed the frequency of compiler diagnostic messages. This information, however, does not have a direct correlation to the types of errors students make, due to the inaccuracy and imprecision…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Programming, Error Patterns, Novices
