Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Science Education | 2 |
| Cues | 2 |
| Programming | 2 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Assignments | 1 |
| Automation | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Concept Mapping | 1 |
| Error Correction | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| ACM Transactions on Computing… | 2 |
Author
| Babes-Vroman Monica | 1 |
| Haldeman, Georgiana | 1 |
| Juho Leinonen | 1 |
| Michael Kölling | 1 |
| Neil C. C. Brown | 1 |
| Nguyen, Thu D. | 1 |
| Paul Denny | 1 |
| Pierre Weill-Tessier | 1 |
| Tjang, Andrew | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Neil C. C. Brown; Pierre Weill-Tessier; Juho Leinonen; Paul Denny; Michael Kölling – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2025
Motivation: Students learning to program often reach states where they are stuck and can make no forward progress--but this may be outside the classroom where no instructor is available to help. In this situation, an automatically generated next-step hint can help them make forward progress and support their learning. It is important to know what…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Programming, Novices, Technology Uses in Education
Haldeman, Georgiana; Babes-Vroman Monica; Tjang, Andrew; Nguyen, Thu D. – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2021
Autograding systems are being increasingly deployed to meet the challenges of teaching programming at scale. Studies show that formative feedback can greatly help novices learn programming. This work extends an autograder, enabling it to provide formative feedback on programming assignment submissions. Our methodology starts with the design of a…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Grading, Automation

Peer reviewed
Direct link
