Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Science Education | 2 |
| Evaluation | 2 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Biofeedback | 1 |
| Career Readiness | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Eye Movements | 1 |
| Influences | 1 |
| Information Technology | 1 |
| Novices | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| ACM Transactions on Computing… | 2 |
Author
| Bonita Sharif | 1 |
| Cole S. Peterson | 1 |
| Juho Leinonen | 1 |
| Michael D. Dodd | 1 |
| Michael Kölling | 1 |
| Neil C. C. Brown | 1 |
| Niloofar Mansoor | 1 |
| Paul Denny | 1 |
| Pierre Weill-Tessier | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkNeil C. C. Brown; Pierre Weill-Tessier; Juho Leinonen; Paul Denny; Michael Kölling – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2025
Motivation: Students learning to program often reach states where they are stuck and can make no forward progress--but this may be outside the classroom where no instructor is available to help. In this situation, an automatically generated next-step hint can help them make forward progress and support their learning. It is important to know what…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Programming, Novices, Technology Uses in Education
Niloofar Mansoor; Cole S. Peterson; Michael D. Dodd; Bonita Sharif – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2024
Background and Context: Understanding how a student programmer solves different task types in different programming languages is essential to understanding how we can further improve teaching tools to support students to be industry-ready when they graduate. It also provides insight into students' thought processes in different task types and…
Descriptors: Biofeedback, Eye Movements, Computer Science Education, Programming Languages
