NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Karnalim, Oscar; Simon; Chivers, William; Panca, Billy Susanto – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2022
To help address programming plagiarism and collusion, students should be informed about acceptable practices and about program similarity, both coincidental and non-coincidental. However, current approaches are usually manual, brief, and delivered well before students are in a situation where they might commit academic misconduct. This article…
Descriptors: Computer Science Education, Programming, Plagiarism, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Haldeman, Georgiana; Babes-Vroman Monica; Tjang, Andrew; Nguyen, Thu D. – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2021
Autograding systems are being increasingly deployed to meet the challenges of teaching programming at scale. Studies show that formative feedback can greatly help novices learn programming. This work extends an autograder, enabling it to provide formative feedback on programming assignment submissions. Our methodology starts with the design of a…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Grading, Automation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Riese, Emma; Bälter, Olle – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2022
Assessment plays an important role in education and can both guide and motivate learning. Assessment can, however, be carried out with different aims: providing the students with feedback that supports the learning (formative assessment) and judging to which degree the students have fulfilled the intended learning outcomes (summative assessment).…
Descriptors: Introductory Courses, Programming, Computer Science Education, Learning Motivation