Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Computational Linguistics | 2 |
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Chinese | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Language Research | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Orthographic Symbols | 1 |
| Readability | 1 |
| Readability Formulas | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Advances in Language and… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Dale Chall Readability Formula | 1 |
| Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
| Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
| Fry Readability Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textZhang, Yanhui – Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 2020
This paper takes a system dynamic approach to study homogeneous texts where the dynamics of the lexical richness of such texts over time are of the focal concern. It is hypothesized that the progress of the lexical complexity is driven by how far away this process is from the maximum level of complexity, while is subject to the fluctuations due to…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Models, Validity, Language Research
Aziz, Anealka; Fook, Chan Yuen; Alsree, Zubaida – Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 2010
Reading materials are considered having high readability if readers are interested to read the materials, understand the content of the materials and able to read the materials fluently. In contrast, reading materials with low readability discourage readers from reading the materials, create difficulties for readers to understand the content of…
Descriptors: Readability, Computational Linguistics, Reading Materials, Second Language Learning
