NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 14 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stickl Haugen, Jaimie; Chouinard, Jill Anne – American Journal of Evaluation, 2019
The concept of power is a complex and often intangible aspect of the evaluation process that is frequently a focal topic among the conceptual evaluation literature concerning collaborative or culturally responsive evaluation (CRE) contexts. Unfortunately, there remains a significant theory to practice gap as power is often rarely addressed or…
Descriptors: Power Structure, Culturally Relevant Education, Theory Practice Relationship, Cooperation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vanderkruik, Rachel; McPherson, Marianne E. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2017
Evaluating initiatives implemented across multiple settings can elucidate how various contextual factors may influence both implementation and outcomes. Understanding context is especially critical when the same program has varying levels of success across settings. We present a framework for evaluating contextual factors affecting an initiative…
Descriptors: Public Health, Sustainability, Program Implementation, Context Effect
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morris, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2015
This essay explores the implications of the zeitgeist that emerged in the United States during the 1960s for the conceptualization of ethical issues in evaluation and community psychology, and how perspectives from the latter field might enhance ethical practice in the former. Special attention is paid to articulations of social justice,…
Descriptors: Ethics, Psychology, Social Justice, Standards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Braverman, Marc T. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2013
Sound evaluation planning requires numerous decisions about how constructs in a program theory will be translated into measures and instruments that produce evaluation data. This article, the first in a dialogue exchange, examines how decisions about measurement are (and should be) made, especially in the context of small-scale local program…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Methods Research, Research Methodology, Research Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Huey T.; Turner, Nannette C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2012
Health promotion and social betterment program interventions are based on either formal theory from academia or stakeholder theory from stakeholders' observations and experiences in working with clients. Over time, formal theory-based interventions have acquired high prestige, while stakeholder theory-based interventions have been held in low…
Descriptors: Intervention, Health Promotion, Program Evaluation, Smoking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Savaya, Riki; Spiro, Shimon E. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2012
This article presents the findings of a large scale study that tested a comprehensive model of predictors of three manifestations of sustainability: continuation, institutionalization, and duration. Based on the literature the predictors were arrayed in four groups: variables pertaining to the project, the auspice organization, the community, and…
Descriptors: Predictor Variables, Sustainability, Questionnaires, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chatterji, Madhabi – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
This article argues with a literature review that a simplistic distinction between strong and weak evidence hinged on the use of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the federal "gold standard" for generating rigorous evidence on social programs and policies, is not tenable with evaluative studies of complex, field interventions such as…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Research Methodology, Educational Research, Research Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fitzpatrick, Jody L.; Christie, Christina A., Ed. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
This article presents an interview with Katrina Bledsoe, a senior research associate with Planning, Research & Evaluation Services (PRES) Associates in Washington, D.C. Dr. Bledsoe was a faculty member in the Psychology Department at The College of New Jersey. She was trained under Stewart Donaldson at Claremont Graduate University (CGU) and…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Prevention, Community Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bledsoe, Katrina L.; Graham, James A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2005
The authors discuss the use of multiple evaluation approaches in conducting program evaluations. Specifically, they illustrate four evaluation approaches (theory-driven, consumer-based, empowerment, and inclusive evaluation) and briefly discuss a fifth (use-focused evaluation) as a side effect of the use of the others. The authors also address the…
Descriptors: Research Design, Program Evaluation, Community Programs, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schnoes, Connie J.; Murphy-Berman, Virginia; Chambers, Jeff M. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2000
Examined the empowerment evaluation approach in the context of a case study of three comprehensive communities' initiatives. Considers issues related to the evaluator's role, differences relative to other inclusive evaluation approaches, stakeholder involvement, evaluation context variables, and the concept and practice of empowering program…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Community Programs, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sridharan, Sanjeev; Campbell, Bernadette; Zinzow, Heidi – American Journal of Evaluation, 2006
The authors present a stakeholder-driven method, the earliest anticipated timeline of impact, which is designed to assess stakeholder expectations for the earliest time frame in which social programs are likely to affect outcomes. The utility of the anticipated timeline of impact is illustrated using an example from an evaluation of a…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Scheduling, Program Development, Community Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cockerill, Rhonda; Myers, Ted; Allman, Dan – American Journal of Evaluation, 2000
Presents a planning guide that can be used to improve community-based evaluation. The guide consists of a set of questions to be discussed with all stakeholders. It covers issues of the nature and purpose of the evaluation, research methods and approaches, participation and decision making, conflict resolution, and dissemination and use of…
Descriptors: Community Programs, Conflict Resolution, Evaluation Methods, Guides
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Clayson, Zoe Cardoza; Castaneda, Xochitl; Sanchez, Emma; Brindis, Claire – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Studied community initiatives in several low-income California Latino communities over 5 years. Results of these analyses show the challenges of blending a critical theory social science approach with community-focused evaluation practice. (SLD)
Descriptors: Community Programs, Evaluation Methods, Hispanic Americans, Low Income Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schweigert, Francis J. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2006
In the present climate of public accountability, there is increasing demand to show "what works" and what return is gained for the public from investments to improve communities. This increasing demand for accountability is being met with growing confidence in the field of philanthropy during the past 10 years that the impact or effectiveness of…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Private Financial Support, Accountability, Philanthropic Foundations