Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 8 |
Descriptor
Data Collection | 9 |
Evaluators | 9 |
Evaluation Methods | 8 |
Program Evaluation | 6 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Intervention | 2 |
Time | 2 |
Acquired Immunodeficiency… | 1 |
Action Research | 1 |
African Americans | 1 |
Audits (Verification) | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
American Journal of Evaluation | 9 |
Author
Azzam, Tarek | 1 |
Bamberger, Michael | 1 |
Blair, Jason | 1 |
Church, Mary | 1 |
Cooksy, Leslie J. | 1 |
Fort, Lucia | 1 |
Foster-Fishman, Pennie G. | 1 |
Hawk, Mary | 1 |
Jacobson, Miriam R. | 1 |
Johnson-Shelton, Deborah | 1 |
McNall, Miles | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 9 |
Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Grade 8 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Afghanistan | 1 |
Oregon | 1 |
Pennsylvania | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jacobson, Miriam R.; Whyte, Cristina E.; Azzam, Tarek – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
Evaluators can work with brief units of text-based data, such as open-ended survey responses, text messages, and social media postings. Online crowdsourcing is a promising method for quantifying large amounts of text-based data by engaging hundreds of people to categorize the data. To further develop and test this method, individuals were…
Descriptors: Mixed Methods Research, Evaluation Methods, Comparative Analysis, Feedback (Response)
Hawk, Mary – American Journal of Evaluation, 2015
Randomized controlled trials are the gold standard in research but may not fully explain or predict outcome variations in community-based interventions. Demonstrating efficacy of externally driven programs in well-controlled environments may not translate to community-based implementation where resources and priorities vary. A bottom-up evaluation…
Descriptors: African Americans, Females, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), Risk Management
Weitzman, Beth C.; Silver, Diana – American Journal of Evaluation, 2013
In this commentary, we examine Braverman's insights into the trade-offs between feasibility and rigor in evaluation measures and reject his assessment of the trade-off as a zero-sum game. We, argue that feasibility and policy salience are, like reliability and validity, intrinsic to the definition of a good measure. To reduce the tension between…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Measures (Individuals), Evaluation Methods, Measurement
Penuel, William R.; Means, Barbara – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
Major advances in the number, capabilities, and quality of state, national, and transnational databases have opened up new opportunities for evaluators. Both large-scale data sets collected for administrative purposes and those collected by other researchers can provide data for a variety of evaluation-related activities. These include (a)…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Data Analysis, Program Evaluation, Evaluators
Williams, Andrew P.; Morris, John C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
The use of theory-driven evaluation is an emerging practice in the military--an aspect generally unknown in the civilian evaluation community. First developed during the 1991 Gulf War and applied in both the Balkans and Afghanistan, these techniques are now being examined in the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) as a means to evaluate the…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Foreign Countries, Evaluation Methods, Developmental Stages
McNall, Miles; Foster-Fishman, Pennie G. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
A central issue in the use of rapid evaluation and assessment methods (REAM) is achieving a balance between speed and trustworthiness. In this article, the authors review the key differences and common features of this family of methods and present a case example that illustrates how evaluators can use rapid evaluation techniques in their own…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Evaluation Methods, Emergency Programs, Action Research
Cooksy, Leslie J. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
All evaluators face the challenge of striving to adhere to the highest possible standards of ethical conduct. Translating the AEA's Guiding Principles and the Joint Committee's Program Evaluation Standards into everyday practice, however, can be a complex, uncertain, and frustrating endeavor. Moreover, acting in an ethical fashion can require…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Evaluators, Ethics, Evaluation Methods
Blair, Jason; Taylor, Ted K.; Johnson-Shelton, Deborah – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
This article describes an innovative data collection procedure. A subsample (n = 164) of a longitudinal research project was assessed using a bank-issued check survey procedure (a removable bank check on which response fields were printed). Using the new procedure, parents returned their surveys simply by depositing or cashing their incentive…
Descriptors: Longitudinal Studies, Data Collection, Surveys, Evaluators
Bamberger, Michael; Rugh, Jim; Church, Mary; Fort, Lucia – American Journal of Evaluation, 2004
The paper discusses two common scenarios in which evaluators must conduct impact evaluations when working under budget, time, or data constraints. Under the first scenario the evaluator is not called in until the project is already well advanced, and there is a tight deadline for completing the evaluation, frequently combined with a limited budget…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Program Effectiveness, Evaluators, Control Groups