Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Anatomy | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Concept Formation | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| Lecture Method | 1 |
| Nonverbal Communication | 1 |
| Spatial Ability | 1 |
| Student Attitudes | 1 |
Source
| Anatomical Sciences Education | 1 |
Author
| Amogh, Bhaskaran Jayaprasad | 1 |
| Nair, Santhanu Jagannath | 1 |
| Oommen, Aswathy Maria | 1 |
| Raju, Nithin Kadakampallil | 1 |
| Suresh, Rakesh Omana | 1 |
| Yohannan, Doris George | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkYohannan, Doris George; Oommen, Aswathy Maria; Amogh, Bhaskaran Jayaprasad; Raju, Nithin Kadakampallil; Suresh, Rakesh Omana; Nair, Santhanu Jagannath – Anatomical Sciences Education, 2022
Spatial understanding of complex anatomical concepts is often a challenge for learners, as well as for educators. It is even more challenging for students with low mental spatial abilities. There are many options to teach spatial relationships, ranging from simple models to high-end three-dimensional (3D) virtual reality tools. Using a randomized…
Descriptors: Anatomy, Spatial Ability, Nonverbal Communication, Lecture Method
