Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Attention Control | 2 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Learning Processes | 2 |
Animation | 1 |
Cognitive Ability | 1 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Computer Software | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Emotional Response | 1 |
Eye Movements | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Applied Cognitive Psychology | 2 |
Author
Chen, Yuping | 1 |
Kühl, Tim | 1 |
Moersdorf, Franziska | 1 |
Münzer, Stefan | 1 |
Römer, Michelle | 1 |
Tsai, Meng-Jung | 1 |
Wu, An-Hsuan | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kühl, Tim; Moersdorf, Franziska; Römer, Michelle; Münzer, Stefan – Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2019
According to the seductive detail effect, adding interesting but irrelevant information (i.e., seductive details) can be detrimental to learning success. In this study, it was explored within two experiments whether the valence of text-based seductive details might affect learning outcomes differently. For Experiments 1 and 2, we pretested…
Descriptors: Emotional Response, Retention (Psychology), Transfer of Training, Pretests Posttests
Tsai, Meng-Jung; Wu, An-Hsuan; Chen, Yuping – Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2019
This study aimed to examine how different forms (still pictures vs. animations) of seductive illustrations impact text-and-graphic learning processes, perceptions, and outcomes. An eye-tracking experiment of three groups (static, dynamic, and control) was conducted with 60 college and graduate students while learning with PowerPoint slides about…
Descriptors: Eye Movements, Illustrations, Learning Processes, Animation