Descriptor
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Equated Scores | 1 |
| Judges | 1 |
| Pass Fail Grading | 1 |
| Robustness (Statistics) | 1 |
| Scaling | 1 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 1 |
| Standards | 1 |
Source
| Applied Measurement in… | 1 |
Author
| Norcini, John | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedNorcini, John; And Others – Applied Measurement in Education, 1994
Whether anchor item sets varying in difficulty and discrimination affect precision of cutting score equivalents generated through judge rescaling as much as equivalents from score equating was studied with 4 groups of experts and 250 and 1,000 examinees. Results indicate the robustness of judge rescaling and its superiority over equating. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Decision Making, Difficulty Level, Equated Scores
