NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stefanie A. Wind; Beyza Aksu-Dunya – Applied Measurement in Education, 2024
Careless responding is a pervasive concern in research using affective surveys. Although researchers have considered various methods for identifying careless responses, studies are limited that consider the utility of these methods in the context of computer adaptive testing (CAT) for affective scales. Using a simulation study informed by recent…
Descriptors: Response Style (Tests), Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Affective Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wang, Xiang-bo; And Others – Applied Measurement in Education, 1995
An experiment is reported in which 225 high school students were asked to choose among several multiple-choice items but then were required to answer them all. It is concluded that allowing choice while having fair tests is only possible when choice is irrelevant in terms of difficulty. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Difficulty Level, Equated Scores, High School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stone, Gregory Ethan; Lunz, Mary E. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1994
Effects of reviewing items and altering responses on examinee ability estimates, test precision, test information, decision confidence, and pass/fail status were studied for 376 examinees taking 2 certification tests. Test precision is only slightly affected by review, and average information loss can be recovered by addition of one item. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Certification, Change