NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Edwards, Michael C.; Flora, David B.; Thissen, David – Applied Measurement in Education, 2012
This article describes a computerized adaptive test (CAT) based on the uniform item exposure multi-form structure (uMFS). The uMFS is a specialization of the multi-form structure (MFS) idea described by Armstrong, Jones, Berliner, and Pashley (1998). In an MFS CAT, the examinee first responds to a small fixed block of items. The items comprising…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Format, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
van der Linden, Wim J.; Glas, Cees A. W. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2000
Performed a simulation study to demonstrate the dramatic impact of capitalization on estimation errors on ability estimation in adaptive testing. Discusses four different strategies to minimize the likelihood of capitalization in computerized adaptive testing. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Estimation (Mathematics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chuah, Siang Chee; Drasgow, Fritz; Luecht, Richard – Applied Measurement in Education, 2006
Adaptive tests offer the advantages of reduced test length and increased accuracy in ability estimation. However, adaptive tests require large pools of precalibrated items. This study looks at the development of an item pool for 1 type of adaptive administration: the computer-adaptive sequential test. An important issue is the sample size required…
Descriptors: Test Length, Sample Size, Adaptive Testing, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Walker, Cindy M.; Beretvas, S. Natasha; Ackerman, Terry – Applied Measurement in Education, 2001
Conducted a simulation study of differential item functioning (DIF) to compare the power and Type I error rates for two conditions: using an examinee's ability estimate as the conditioning variable with the CATSIB program and either using the regression correction from CATSIB or not. Discusses implications of findings for DIF detection. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wise, Steven L.; Finney, Sara J.; Enders, Craig K.; Freeman, Sharon A.; Severance, Donald D. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1999
Examined whether providing item review on a computerized adaptive test could be used by examinees to inflate their scores. Two studies involving 139 undergraduates suggest that examinees are not highly proficient at discriminating item difficulty. A simulation study showed the usefulness of a strategy identified by G. Kingsbury (1996) as a way to…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level, Higher Education