NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bimpeh, Yaw; Pointer, William; Smith, Ben Alexander; Harrison, Liz – Applied Measurement in Education, 2020
Many high-stakes examinations in the United Kingdom (UK) use both constructed-response items and selected-response items. We need to evaluate the inter-rater reliability for constructed-response items that are scored by humans. While there are a variety of methods for evaluating rater consistency across ratings in the psychometric literature, we…
Descriptors: Scoring, Generalizability Theory, Interrater Reliability, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kannan, Priya; Sgammato, Adrienne; Tannenbaum, Richard J.; Katz, Irvin R. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2015
The Angoff method requires experts to view every item on the test and make a probability judgment. This can be time consuming when there are large numbers of items on the test. In this study, a G-theory framework was used to determine if a subset of items can be used to make generalizable cut-score recommendations. Angoff ratings (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Reliability, Standard Setting (Scoring), Cutting Scores, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kachchaf, Rachel; Solano-Flores, Guillermo – Applied Measurement in Education, 2012
We examined how rater language background affects the scoring of short-answer, open-ended test items in the assessment of English language learners (ELLs). Four native English and four native Spanish-speaking certified bilingual teachers scored 107 responses of fourth- and fifth-grade Spanish-speaking ELLs to mathematics items administered in…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, English Language Learners, Scoring, Bilingual Teachers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clauser, Brian E.; Harik, Polina; Margolis, Melissa J.; McManus, I. C.; Mollon, Jennifer; Chis, Liliana; Williams, Simon – Applied Measurement in Education, 2009
Numerous studies have compared the Angoff standard-setting procedure to other standard-setting methods, but relatively few studies have evaluated the procedure based on internal criteria. This study uses a generalizability theory framework to evaluate the stability of the estimated cut score. To provide a measure of internal consistency, this…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Group Discussion, Standard Setting (Scoring), Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lee, Guemin; Frisbie, David A. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1999
Studied the appropriateness and implications of using a generalizability theory approach to estimating the reliability of scores from tests composed of testlets. Analyses of data from two national standardization samples suggest that manipulating the number of passages is a more productive way to obtain efficient measurement than manipulating the…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Models, National Surveys, Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Norcini, John; Grosso, Lou – Applied Measurement in Education, 1998
Ratings of test item relevance were collected from 57 practitioners from a pretest of a medical certifying examination. Ratings were correlated with item difficulty, but the relationship between ratings and item discrimination was less clear. Application of generalizability theory shows that reasonable estimates of item, stem, and total test…
Descriptors: Certification, Difficulty Level, Estimation (Mathematics), Generalizability Theory