Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 4 |
Adaptive Testing | 3 |
Foreign Countries | 3 |
Test Items | 3 |
College Students | 2 |
Computation | 2 |
Item Response Theory | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Behavior Problems | 1 |
Cheating | 1 |
College Admission | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Applied Psychological… | 4 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 4 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Netherlands | 2 |
West Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Greiff, Samuel; Wustenberg, Sascha; Funke, Joachim – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
This article addresses two unsolved measurement issues in dynamic problem solving (DPS) research: (a) unsystematic construction of DPS tests making a comparison of results obtained in different studies difficult and (b) use of time-intensive single tasks leading to severe reliability problems. To solve these issues, the MicroDYN approach is…
Descriptors: Problem Solving, Tests, Measurement, Structural Equation Models
Tendeiro, Jorge N.; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
This article extends the work by Armstrong and Shi on CUmulative SUM (CUSUM) person-fit methodology. The authors present new theoretical considerations concerning the use of CUSUM person-fit statistics based on likelihood ratios for the purpose of detecting cheating and random guessing by individual test takers. According to the Neyman-Pearson…
Descriptors: Cheating, Individual Testing, Adaptive Testing, Statistics
Belov, Dmitry I.; Armstrong, Ronald D.; Weissman, Alexander – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2008
This article presents a new algorithm for computerized adaptive testing (CAT) when content constraints are present. The algorithm is based on shadow CAT methodology to meet content constraints but applies Monte Carlo methods and provides the following advantages over shadow CAT: (a) lower maximum item exposure rates, (b) higher utilization of the…
Descriptors: Test Items, Monte Carlo Methods, Law Schools, Adaptive Testing
Hol, A. Michiel; Vorst, Harrie C. M.; Mellenbergh, Gideon J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2007
In a randomized experiment (n = 515), a computerized and a computerized adaptive test (CAT) are compared. The item pool consists of 24 polytomous motivation items. Although items are carefully selected, calibration data show that Samejima's graded response model did not fit the data optimally. A simulation study is done to assess possible…
Descriptors: Student Motivation, Simulation, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing