Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 13 |
Descriptor
Error of Measurement | 24 |
Item Response Theory | 12 |
Monte Carlo Methods | 8 |
Test Items | 8 |
Comparative Analysis | 7 |
Computation | 7 |
Correlation | 6 |
Models | 6 |
Sample Size | 6 |
Test Bias | 6 |
Simulation | 5 |
More ▼ |
Source
Applied Psychological… | 24 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 24 |
Reports - Research | 24 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
ACT Assessment | 1 |
Law School Admission Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ip, Edward Hak-Sing; Chen, Shyh-Huei – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
The problem of fitting unidimensional item-response models to potentially multidimensional data has been extensively studied. The focus of this article is on response data that contains a major dimension of interest but that may also contain minor nuisance dimensions. Because fitting a unidimensional model to multidimensional data results in…
Descriptors: Measurement, Item Response Theory, Scores, Computation
Finch, W. Holmes – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
Increasingly, researchers interested in identifying potentially biased test items are encouraged to use a confirmatory, rather than exploratory, approach. One such method for confirmatory testing is rooted in differential bundle functioning (DBF), where hypotheses regarding potential differential item functioning (DIF) for sets of items (bundles)…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Test Items, Statistical Analysis, Models
Wang, Wen-Chung; Shih, Ching-Lin – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2010
Three multiple indicators-multiple causes (MIMIC) methods, namely, the standard MIMIC method (M-ST), the MIMIC method with scale purification (M-SP), and the MIMIC method with a pure anchor (M-PA), were developed to assess differential item functioning (DIF) in polytomous items. In a series of simulations, it appeared that all three methods…
Descriptors: Methods, Test Bias, Test Items, Error of Measurement
Monahan, Patrick O.; Ankenmann, Robert D. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2010
When the matching score is either less than perfectly reliable or not a sufficient statistic for determining latent proficiency in data conforming to item response theory (IRT) models, Type I error (TIE) inflation may occur for the Mantel-Haenszel (MH) procedure or any differential item functioning (DIF) procedure that matches on summed-item…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Item Response Theory, Test Bias, Scores
Kim, Doyoung; De Ayala, R. J.; Ferdous, Abdullah A.; Nering, Michael L. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2011
To realize the benefits of item response theory (IRT), one must have model-data fit. One facet of a model-data fit investigation involves assessing the tenability of the conditional item independence (CII) assumption. In this Monte Carlo study, the comparative performance of 10 indices for identifying conditional item dependence is assessed. The…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Monte Carlo Methods, Error of Measurement, Statistical Analysis
Kim, Seonghoon – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2010
The three types (generalized, unweighted, and weighted) of least squares methods, proposed by Ogasawara, for estimating item response theory (IRT) linking coefficients under dichotomous models are extended to the graded response model. A simulation study was conducted to confirm the accuracy of the extended formulas, and a real data study was…
Descriptors: Least Squares Statistics, Computation, Item Response Theory, Models
Andrich, David; Kreiner, Svend – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2010
Models of modern test theory imply statistical independence among responses, generally referred to as "local independence." One violation of local independence occurs when the response to one item governs the response to a subsequent item. Expanding on a formulation of this kind of violation as a process in the dichotomous Rasch model,…
Descriptors: Test Theory, Item Response Theory, Test Items, Correlation
Woods, Carol M. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2011
Differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when an item on a test, questionnaire, or interview has different measurement properties for one group of people versus another, irrespective of true group-mean differences on the constructs being measured. This article is focused on item response theory based likelihood ratio testing for DIF (IRT-LR or…
Descriptors: Simulation, Item Response Theory, Testing, Questionnaires
Laenen, Annouschka; Alonso, Ariel; Molenberghs, Geert; Vangeneugden, Tony; Mallinckrodt, Craig H. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2010
Longitudinal studies are permeating clinical trials in psychiatry. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to study the psychometric properties of rating scales, frequently used in these trials, within a longitudinal framework. However, intrasubject serial correlation and memory effects are problematic issues often encountered in longitudinal data.…
Descriptors: Psychiatry, Rating Scales, Memory, Psychometrics
Finch, Holmes – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2010
The accuracy of item parameter estimates in the multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) model context is one that has not been researched in great detail. This study examines the ability of two confirmatory factor analysis models specifically for dichotomous data to properly estimate item parameters using common formulae for converting factor…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Computation, Factor Analysis, Models

Ogasawara, Haruhiko – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2002
Obtained asymptotic standard errors of item, test, and score information function estimates, and used numerical illustrations to show that the response function estimates are rather stable in spite of the unstable parameter estimates. However, information function estimates are shown to be relatively unstable. (SLD)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Item Response Theory, Reliability

Rasmussen, Jeffrey Lee – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1988
The performance was studied of five small-sample statistics--by F. M. Lord, W. Kristof, Q. McNemar, R. A. Forsyth and L. S. Feldt, and J. P. Braden--that test whether two variables measure the same trait except for measurement error. Effects of non-normality were investigated. The McNemar statistic was most powerful. (TJH)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Monte Carlo Methods, Psychometrics, Sample Size

Thompson, Paul – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1989
Monte Carlo techniques were used to examine regression approaches to external unfolding. The present analysis examined the technique to determine if various characteristics of the points are recovered (such as ideal points). Generally, monotonic analyses resulted in good recovery. (TJH)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Mathematical Models, Monte Carlo Methods
van der Linden, Wim J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2006
Traditionally, error in equating observed scores on two versions of a test is defined as the difference between the transformations that equate the quantiles of their distributions in the sample and population of test takers. But it is argued that if the goal of equating is to adjust the scores of test takers on one version of the test to make…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Evaluation Criteria, Models, Error of Measurement
de la Torre, Jimmy; Stark, Stephen; Chernyshenko, Oleksandr S. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2006
The authors present a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) parameter estimation procedure for the generalized graded unfolding model (GGUM) and compare it to the marginal maximum likelihood (MML) approach implemented in the GGUM2000 computer program, using simulated and real personality data. In the simulation study, test length, number of response…
Descriptors: Computation, Monte Carlo Methods, Markov Processes, Item Response Theory
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2