Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Test Reliability | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Armed Forces | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Cognitive Measurement | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Males | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Psychological… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMellenbergh, Gideon J.; van der Linden, Wim J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
For six tests, coefficient delta as an index for internal optimality is computed. Internal optimality is defined as the magnitude of risk of the decision procedure with respect to the true score. Results are compared with an alternative index (coefficient kappa) for assessing the consistency of decisions. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Classification, Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewedDunlap, William P.; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1989
The reliability of derived measures from 4 cognitive paradigms was studied using 19 Navy enlisted men (aged between 18 and 24 years). The paradigms were: graphemic and phonemic analysis; semantic memory retrieval; lexical decision making; and letter classification. Results indicate that derived scores may have low reliability. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adults, Armed Forces, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes
