NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Deng, Nina; Han, Kyung T.; Hambleton, Ronald K. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2013
DIMPACK Version 1.0 for assessing test dimensionality based on a nonparametric conditional covariance approach is reviewed. This software was originally distributed by Assessment Systems Corporation and now can be freely accessed online. The software consists of Windows-based interfaces of three components: DIMTEST, DETECT, and CCPROX/HAC, which…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Nonparametric Statistics, Statistical Analysis, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nandakumar, Ratna; Yu, Feng; Zhang, Yanwei – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2011
DETECT is a nonparametric methodology to identify the dimensional structure underlying test data. The associated DETECT index, "D[subscript max]," denotes the degree of multidimensionality in data. Conditional covariances (CCOV) are the building blocks of this index. In specifying population CCOVs, the latent test composite [theta][subscript TT]…
Descriptors: Nonparametric Statistics, Statistical Analysis, Tests, Data
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van Abswoude, Alexandra A. H.; van der Ark, L. Andries; Sijtsma, Klaas – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2004
In this article, an overview of nonparametric item response theory methods for determining the dimensionality of item response data is provided. Four methods were considered: MSP, DETECT, HCA/CCPROX, and DIMTEST. First, the methods were compared theoretically. Second, a simulation study was done to compare the effectiveness of MSP, DETECT, and…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Software, Simulation, Nonparametric Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Penfield, Randall D. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2005
Differential item functioning (DIF) is an important consideration in assessing the validity of test scores (Camilli & Shepard, 1994). A variety of statistical procedures have been developed to assess DIF in tests of dichotomous (Hills, 1989; Millsap & Everson, 1993) and polytomous (Penfield & Lam, 2000; Potenza & Dorans, 1995) items. Some of these…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Item Analysis, Psychological Studies, Evaluation Methods