NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)3
Source
Applied Psychological…3
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Monahan, Patrick O.; Ankenmann, Robert D. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2010
When the matching score is either less than perfectly reliable or not a sufficient statistic for determining latent proficiency in data conforming to item response theory (IRT) models, Type I error (TIE) inflation may occur for the Mantel-Haenszel (MH) procedure or any differential item functioning (DIF) procedure that matches on summed-item…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Item Response Theory, Test Bias, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cui, Zhongmin; Kolen, Michael J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2008
This article considers two methods of estimating standard errors of equipercentile equating: the parametric bootstrap method and the nonparametric bootstrap method. Using a simulation study, these two methods are compared under three sample sizes (300, 1,000, and 3,000), for two test content areas (the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Maps and Diagrams…
Descriptors: Test Length, Test Content, Simulation, Computation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Emons, Wilco H. M. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2008
Person-fit methods are used to uncover atypical test performance as reflected in the pattern of scores on individual items in a test. Unlike parametric person-fit statistics, nonparametric person-fit statistics do not require fitting a parametric test theory model. This study investigates the effectiveness of generalizations of nonparametric…
Descriptors: Simulation, Nonparametric Statistics, Item Response Theory, Goodness of Fit