NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Paek, Insu – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2010
Conservative bias in rejection of a null hypothesis from using the continuity correction in the Mantel-Haenszel (MH) procedure was examined through simulation in a differential item functioning (DIF) investigation context in which statistical testing uses a prespecified level [alpha] for the decision on an item with respect to DIF. The standard MH…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Statistical Analysis, Sample Size, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lam, Tony C. M.; Kolic, Mary – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2008
Semantic incompatibility, an error in constructing measuring instruments for rating oneself, others, or objects, refers to the extent to which item wordings are incongruent with, and hence inappropriate for, scale labels and vice versa. This study examines the effects of semantic incompatibility on rating responses. Using a 2 x 2 factorial design…
Descriptors: Semantics, Rating Scales, Statistical Analysis, Academic Ability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Forsyth, Robert A. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
This note shows that, under conditions specified by Levin and Subkoviak (TM 503 420), it is not necessary to specify the reliabilities of observed scores when comparing completely randomized designs with randomized block designs. Certain errors in their illustrative example are also discussed. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing, Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Levin, Joel R.; Subkoviak, Michael J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
Comments (TM 503 706) on an earlier article (TM 503 420) concerning the comparison of the completely randomized design and the randomized block design are acknowledged and appreciated. In addition, potentially misleading notions arising from these comments are addressed and clarified. (See also TM 503 708). (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing, Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Forsyth, Robert A. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
This note continues the discussion of earlier articles (TM 503 420, TM 503 706, and TM 503 707), comparing the completely randomized design with the randomized block design. (CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing, Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sotaridona, Leonardo S.; van der Linden, Wim J.; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2006
A statistical test for detecting answer copying on multiple-choice tests based on Cohen's kappa is proposed. The test is free of any assumptions on the response processes of the examinees suspected of copying and having served as the source, except for the usual assumption that these processes are probabilistic. Because the asymptotic null and…
Descriptors: Cheating, Test Items, Simulation, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Levin, Joel R.; Subkoviak, Michael J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977
Textbook calculations of statistical power or sample size follow from formulas that assume that the variables under consideration are measured without error. However, in the real world of behavioral research, errors of measurement cannot be neglected. The determination of sample size is discussed, and an example illustrates blocking strategy.…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing