NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 16 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jingchen Liu; Gongjun Xu; Zhiliang Ying – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
The recent surge of interests in cognitive assessment has led to developments of novel statistical models for diagnostic classification. Central to many such models is the well-known "Q"-matrix, which specifies the item-attribute relationships. This article proposes a data-driven approach to identification of the "Q"-matrix and…
Descriptors: Matrices, Computation, Statistical Analysis, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chiu, Chia-Yi – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2013
Most methods for fitting cognitive diagnosis models to educational test data and assigning examinees to proficiency classes require the Q-matrix that associates each item in a test with the cognitive skills (attributes) needed to answer it correctly. In most cases, the Q-matrix is not known but is constructed from the (fallible) judgments of…
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Diagnostic Tests, Models, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
DeCarlo, Lawrence T. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2011
Cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) attempt to uncover latent skills or attributes that examinees must possess in order to answer test items correctly. The DINA (deterministic input, noisy "and") model is a popular CDM that has been widely used. It is shown here that a logistic version of the model can easily be fit with standard software for…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Computation, Cognitive Tests, Diagnostic Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
van Schuur, Wijbrandt H.; Kiers, Henk A. L. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1994
The identification of two factors when one factor is expected is an artifact caused by using factor analysis on data that would be more appropriately analyzed with a unidimensional unfolding model. A numerical illustration is given, and ways to determine whether data conform to the unidimensional unfolding model are reviewed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Matrices, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rodgers, Joseph Lee; Thompson, Tony D. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1992
A flexible data analysis approach is proposed that combines the psychometric procedures seriation and multidimensional scaling. The method, which is particularly appropriate for analysis of proximities containing temporal information, is illustrated using a matrix of cocitations in publications by 18 presidents of the Psychometric Society.…
Descriptors: Citations (References), Cluster Analysis, Mathematical Models, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schweizer, Karl – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1991
An equal-level approach is proposed for investigating multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrices with respect to other organizational units that contain additional information concerning a MTMM matrix's validity. The approach requires equality in "data level" before coefficients are submitted for evaluation. Disaggregation is central to…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Equations (Mathematics), Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brannick, Michael T.; Spector, Paul E. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1990
Applications of the confirmatory factor analysis block-diagonal model to published data on 18 multitrait-multimethod matrices were reviewed to show widespread estimation problems. Possible causes of estimation difficulties were explored using computer simulations. These problems make the block-diagonal approach less useful than has generally been…
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Mathematical Models, Matrices, Multitrait Multimethod Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Krus, David J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
The Cartesian theory of dimensionality (defined in terms of geometric distances between points in the test space) and Leibnitzian theory (defined in terms of order-generative connected, transitive, and asymmetric relations) are contrasted in terms of the difference between a factor analysis and an order analysis of the same data. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Mathematical Models, Matrices, Multidimensional Scaling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bart, William M. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
Two sets of five items each from the Law School Admission Test were analyzed by two methods of factor analysis, and by the Krus-Bart ordering theoretic method of multidimensional scaling. The results indicated a conceptual gap between latent trait theoretic procedures and order theoretic procedures. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Higher Education, Mathematical Models, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sijtsma, Klaas; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1992
A method is proposed for investigating the intersection of item response functions in the nonparametric item-response-theory model of R. J. Mokken (1971). Results from a Monte Carlo study support the proposed use of the transposed data matrix H(sup T) as an extension to Mokken's approach. (SLD)
Descriptors: Equations (Mathematics), Item Response Theory, Mathematical Models, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schmitt, Neal – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
Path analyses of two multitrait-multimethod matrices are used as examples of the kind of information afforded by application of the technique. It is concluded that the technique should be of considerable aid to researchers who want to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of their measures. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Correlation, Critical Path Method, Factor Analysis, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kaiser, Henry F.; Derflinger, Gerhard – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1990
The fundamental mathematical model of L. L. Thurstone's common factor analysis is reviewed, and basic covariance matrices of maximum likelihood factor analysis and alpha factor analysis are presented. The methods are compared in terms of computational and scaling contrasts. Weighting and the appropriate number of common factors are considered.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Equations (Mathematics), Factor Analysis, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ceurvorst, Robert W.; Krus, David J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
A method for computation of dominance relations and for construction of their corresponding hierarchical structures is presented. The link between dominance and variance allows integration of the mathematical theory of information with least squares statistical procedures without recourse to logarithmic transformations of the data. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Information Theory, Least Squares Statistics, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Baker, Frank B. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1993
Using simulation, the effect that misspecification of elements in the weight matrix has on estimates of basic parameters of the linear logistic test model was studied. Results indicate that, because specifying elements of the weight matrix is a subjective process, it must be done with great care. (SLD)
Descriptors: Error Patterns, Estimation (Mathematics), Item Response Theory, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
van der Linden, Wim J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
The restrictions on item difficulties that must be met when binomial models are applied to domain-referenced testing are examined. Both a deterministic and a stochastic conception of item responses are discussed with respect to difficulty and Guttman-type items. (Author/BH)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Item Sampling, Latent Trait Theory, Mathematical Models
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2