NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kim, Doyoung; De Ayala, R. J.; Ferdous, Abdullah A.; Nering, Michael L. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2011
To realize the benefits of item response theory (IRT), one must have model-data fit. One facet of a model-data fit investigation involves assessing the tenability of the conditional item independence (CII) assumption. In this Monte Carlo study, the comparative performance of 10 indices for identifying conditional item dependence is assessed. The…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Monte Carlo Methods, Error of Measurement, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Emons, Wilco H. M. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2008
Person-fit methods are used to uncover atypical test performance as reflected in the pattern of scores on individual items in a test. Unlike parametric person-fit statistics, nonparametric person-fit statistics do not require fitting a parametric test theory model. This study investigates the effectiveness of generalizations of nonparametric…
Descriptors: Simulation, Nonparametric Statistics, Item Response Theory, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wainer, Howard; Thissen, David – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
A class of naive estimators of correlation was tested for robustness, accuracy, and efficiency against Pearson's r, Tukey's r, and Spearman's r. It was found that this class of estimators seems to be superior, being less affected by outliers, reasonably efficient, and frequently more easily calculated. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Goodness of Fit, Nonparametric Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Greener, Jack M.; Osburn, H. G. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
A correction procedure for estimating correlation coefficients when faced with the problem of a restricted range in the variables due to an explicit selection procedure was empirically investigated. Results indicated that the assumption of linearity is critical, but that homoscedasticity is less important. (JKS)
Descriptors: Adults, Correlation, Data Analysis, Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Holt, Judith A.; Macready, George B. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1989
The robustness of the likelihood ratio difference statistic to the violation of a regularity condition when used to assess differences in fit provided by pairs of latent class models was investigated. Recommendations are made regarding the use of the statistic under violation of the regularity condition. (SLD)
Descriptors: Chi Square, Comparative Analysis, Goodness of Fit, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
DeMars, Christine E. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2004
Type I error rates were examined for several fit indices available in GGUM2000: extensions of Infit, Outfit, Andrich's X(2), and the log-likelihood ratio X(2). Infit and Outfit had Type I error rates much lower than nominal alpha. Andrich's X(2) had Type I error rates much higher than nominal alpha, particularly for shorter tests or larger sample…
Descriptors: Likert Scales, Error of Measurement, Goodness of Fit, Psychological Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reise, Steven P. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1990
To demonstrate that some methods used to assess item fit can be applied to assess person fit and vice versa, performance of a chi-squared item-fit statistic was compared with that of a likelihood-based person-fit statistic for examinees and items under Monte Carlo conditions. (SLD)
Descriptors: Chi Square, Comparative Analysis, Goodness of Fit, Item Response Theory