Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| English (Second Language) | 2 |
| Essay Tests | 2 |
| Language Tests | 2 |
| Writing Evaluation | 2 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Discourse Analysis | 1 |
| English Language Learners | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| Evaluation Research | 1 |
| Field Tests | 1 |
| Grammar | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessing Writing | 2 |
Author
| Baba, Kyoko | 1 |
| Cumming, Alister | 1 |
| Eouanzoui, Keanre | 1 |
| Erdosy, Usman | 1 |
| James, Mark | 1 |
| Kantor, Robert | 1 |
| Weigle, Sara Cushing | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWeigle, Sara Cushing – Assessing Writing, 2013
This article presents considerations for using automated scoring systems to evaluate second language writing. A distinction is made between English language learners in English-medium educational systems and those studying English in their own countries for a variety of purposes, and between learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in a second…
Descriptors: Scoring, Second Language Learning, Second Languages, English Language Learners
Cumming, Alister; Kantor, Robert; Baba, Kyoko; Erdosy, Usman; Eouanzoui, Keanre; James, Mark – Assessing Writing, 2005
We assessed whether and how the discourse written for prototype integrated tasks (involving writing in response to print or audio source texts) field tested for Next Generation TOEFL[R] differs from the discourse written for independent essays (i.e., the TOEFL Essay[R]). We selected 216 compositions written for six tasks by 36 examinees in a field…
Descriptors: Grammar, Field Tests, English (Second Language), Pragmatics
