Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Interpersonal Relationship | 4 |
Correlation | 3 |
Measures (Individuals) | 3 |
Undergraduate Students | 3 |
Validity | 3 |
Models | 2 |
Anxiety | 1 |
Anxiety Disorders | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Construct Validity | 1 |
Evaluation Methods | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Assessment | 5 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Inventory of Interpersonal… | 5 |
Center for Epidemiologic… | 1 |
State Trait Anxiety Inventory | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wright, Aidan G. C.; Pincus, Aaron L.; Hopwood, Christopher J.; Thomas, Katherine M.; Markon, Kristian E.; Krueger, Robert F. – Assessment, 2012
The proposed changes to the personality disorder section of the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" (5th ed.) places an increased focus on interpersonal impairment as one of the defining features of personality psychopathology. In addition, a proposed trait model has been offered to provide a means of capturing…
Descriptors: Personality Traits, Personality Problems, Psychopathology, Interpersonal Relationship
Kemper, Christoph J.; Lutz, Johannes; Bahr, Tobias; Ruddel, Heinz; Hock, Michael – Assessment, 2012
Using two clinical samples of patients, the presented studies examined the construct validity of the recently revised Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3). Confirmatory factor analyses established a clear three-factor structure that corresponds to the postulated subdivision of the construct into correlated somatic, social, and cognitive components.…
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Reliability, Anxiety, Measures (Individuals)
Hess, Timothy R.; Rohlfing, Jessica E.; Hardy, Amanda O.; Glidden-Tracey, Cynthia; Tracey, Terence J. G. – Assessment, 2010
This study examined whether the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ) and its subscales assessed unique interpersonal distress. The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP) was used to assess discriminant validity for unique interpersonal distress. Participants (N = 121) were recruited from a southwestern university counselor training center. Significant…
Descriptors: Questionnaires, Interpersonal Relationship, Psychological Patterns, Problems
Slaney, Robert B.; Pincus, Aaron L.; Uliaszek, Amanda A.; Wang, Kenneth T. – Assessment, 2006
This study examined two conceptions of perfectionism in relation to interpersonal problems. Two hundred and seventy-nine undergraduate participants completed the Almost Perfect Scale-Revised (APS-R) and the Dyadic Almost Perfect Scale (DAPS). The authors used empirically derived discriminant functions (APS-R) and cluster analysis (DAPS) to…
Descriptors: Interpersonal Relationship, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Profiles

Hill, Robert W.; Zrull, Mark C.; McIntire, Karen – Assessment, 1998
Findings from 214 pairs of undergraduates support the validity of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Circumplex (L. Alden, J. Wiggins, and A. Pincus, 1990) and describe discrepancies in self- versus peer-reported interpersonal problems. Results also describe differences in the general interpersonal distress factor accounted for by ipsatizing…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Interpersonal Relationship, Peer Evaluation, Self Evaluation (Individuals)