Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 5 |
| Construct Validity | 5 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 3 |
| Correlation | 2 |
| Evaluation Research | 2 |
| Factor Analysis | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Intelligence | 2 |
| Patients | 2 |
| Predictive Validity | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessment | 5 |
Author
| Bogels, Susan M. | 1 |
| Bowden, Stephen C. | 1 |
| Douglas, Kevin S. | 1 |
| Edens, John F. | 1 |
| Gaughan, Eric T. | 1 |
| Johnstone, Brick | 1 |
| Kamphuis, Jan H. | 1 |
| Maples, Jessica | 1 |
| Miller, Joshua D. | 1 |
| Muskens, Jan G. A. M. | 1 |
| Price, Joanna | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Belgium | 1 |
| Canada | 1 |
| Netherlands | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| NEO Personality Inventory | 1 |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMiller, Joshua D.; Gaughan, Eric T.; Maples, Jessica; Price, Joanna – Assessment, 2011
Despite being significantly correlated, there is evidence to suggest that the scales measuring Agreeableness from the Big Five Inventory (BFI) and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) do not capture identical constructs. More specifically, NEO PI-R Agreeableness contains content related to "honesty and humility" that is not…
Descriptors: Personality Problems, Personality Measures, Measures (Individuals), Construct Validity
de Bruin, Esther I.; Topper, Maurice; Muskens, Jan G. A. M.; Bogels, Susan M.; Kamphuis, Jan H. – Assessment, 2012
The factor structure, internal consistency, construct validity, and predictive validity of the Dutch version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-NL) were studied in a sample of meditators (n = 288) and nonmeditators (n = 451). A five-factor structure was demonstrated in both samples, and the FFMQ-NL and its subscales were shown to…
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Predictive Validity, Factor Structure, Measures (Individuals)
Bowden, Stephen C.; Saklofske, Donald H.; Weiss, Lawrence G. – Assessment, 2011
Examination of measurement invariance provides a powerful method to evaluate the hypothesis that the same set of psychological constructs underlies a set of test scores in different populations. If measurement invariance is observed, then the same psychological meaning can be ascribed to scores in both populations. In this study, the measurement…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Construct Validity, Older Adults, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewedJohnstone, Brick; Wilhelm, Karen L. – Assessment, 1997
The construct validity of the Hooper Visual Organization Test (VOT) (H. Hooper, 1983) was studied by comparing it to conceptually similar and dissimilar cognitive abilities in a principal components analysis of results from 240 participants with cognitive impairment. Results suggest that the VOT is best considered a measure of visual-spatial…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Tests, Comparative Analysis, Construct Validity
Edens, John F.; Skeem, Jennifer L.; Douglas, Kevin S. – Assessment, 2006
This study compares two instruments frequently used to assess risk for violence, the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV), in a large sample of civil psychiatric patients. Despite a strong bivariate relationship with community violence, the VRAG could not improve on the predictive validity…
Descriptors: Predictive Validity, Violence, At Risk Persons, Check Lists
