NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Methodological Issues in Evaluating Rorschach Validity: A Comment on Burns and Viglione (1996), Weiner (1996), and Ganellen (1996).
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wood, James M.; Nezworski, M. Teresa; Stejskal, William J.; Garven, Sena; West, Stephen G. – Assessment, 1999
Discusses three recent studies of the validity of Rorschach test (H. Rorschach, 1921) that have not evaluated methodological issues carefully. Identifies methodological errors in each study and offers specific information for the interpretation of Rorschach results. (SLD)
Descriptors: Personality Assessment, Personality Measures, Research Methodology, Research Problems
Relative User Ratings of MMPI-2 Computer-Based Test Interpretations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Williams, John E.; Weed, Nathan C. – Assessment, 2004
There are eight commercially available computer-based test interpretations (CBTIs) for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2), of which few have been empirically evaluated. Prospective users of these programs have little scientific data to guide choice of a program. This study compared ratings of these eight CBTIs. Test users…
Descriptors: Rating Scales, Measurement Techniques, Test Interpretation, Personality Measures
Partially Random MMPI-2 Protocols: When Are They Interpretable?
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gallen, Robert T.; Berry, David T. R. – Assessment, 1997
A study with 804 undergraduates finds that Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 protocols that contain random responding with an onset after item 370 can be distinguished from protocols with an earlier onset of random responding. Results suggest that protocols with late random responding may be interpretable in terms of basic clinical and…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Diagnostic Tests, Higher Education, Personality Assessment