NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huxham, Mark; Scoles, Jenny; Green, Ursula; Purves, Samantha; Welsh, Zoe; Gray, Andrew – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2017
Peer review is a powerful method to enhance teaching in higher education. Peers, however, may not be the most relevant people in evaluating teaching success; as the most important stakeholders in learning, students' evaluations need to be heard. Whilst some efforts to capture "the student voice" are simplistic and may foster consumerist…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, Evaluation Methods, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huxham, Mark; Campbell, Fiona; Westwood, Jenny – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2012
Student performance in and attitudes towards oral and written assessments were compared using quantitative and qualitative methods. Two separate cohorts of students were examined. The first larger cohort of students (n = 99) was randomly divided into "oral" and "written" groups, and the marks that they achieved in the same…
Descriptors: Oral Language, Methods, Comparative Analysis, Qualitative Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huxham, Mark; Laybourn, Phyllis; Cairncross, Sandra; Gray, Morag; Brown, Norrie; Goldfinch, Judy; Earl, Shirley – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2008
A study was conducted comparing the feedback received from students about teaching obtained using different instruments. Twelve first- and second-year undergraduate modules were selected from seven different schools within a single university. Students studying each module were allocated to "questionnaire" and "comparator" groups. "Questionnaire"…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Formative Evaluation, Focus Groups, Questionnaires