Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Confidentiality | 1 |
| Educational Attainment | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessment & Evaluation in… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Belgium | 1 |
| China | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkPanadero, Ernesto; Alqassab, Maryam – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019
Peer assessment has proven to have positive learning outcomes. Importantly, peer assessment is a social process and some claim that the use of anonymity might have advantages. However, the findings have not always been in the same direction. Our aims were: (a) to review the effects of using anonymity in peer assessment on performance, peer…
Descriptors: Confidentiality, Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Grading
Peer reviewedMartin, Susan; Cloke, Chris – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2000
Raises concerns about the assessment procedures implicit in the new British standards for the award of qualified teacher status. Suggests that these procedures straddle a hybrid position in terms of the basic assessment model and that little regard has been given to the rationale behind the standards, their implementation, or the effects on…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries, Higher Education
