NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nestel, Debra; Ivkovic, Amelie; Hill, Robyn A.; Warrens, Anthony N.; Paraskevas, Paraskeva A.; McDonnell, Jacqueline A.; Mudarikwa, Ruvimbo S.; Browne, Chris – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2012
Programme evaluation is essential for quality assurance in education. In this paper, we describe our evaluation strategy for the first year of a new medical programme. Although we used multiple methods in the evaluation, the use of the focus group method was core. This paper reports our experiences of focus groups for this purpose. We describe the…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Medical Schools, Research Methodology, Focus Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sadler, D. Royce – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2010
If a grade is to be trusted as an authentic representation of a student's level of academic achievement, one of the requirements is that all the elements that contribute to that grade must qualify as achievement, and not be something else. The implications of taking this proposition literally turn out to be far reaching. Many elements that are…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Academic Achievement, Integrity, Credits
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stodberg, Ulf – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2012
The use of e-assessment in higher education is a relatively new educational practice that has been more frequently studied in recent years. This review aims to summarise some research on e-assessment, providing an overview based on articles from three well-established scientific journals. Focusing on research topics, settings for e-assessment and…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Online Courses, Longitudinal Studies, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zakrzewski, Stan; Bull, Joanna – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1998
An interactive, computer-based assessment system implemented at the University of Luton (England) delivers end-of-module examinations, formative assessments, and self-assessment options. Student and faculty response to computer-based objective testing has been positive and suggests the approach is desirable both pedagogically and economically.…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Foreign Countries, Formative Evaluation, Higher Education