ERIC Number: EJ1463649
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2025
Pages: 16
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0260-2938
EISSN: EISSN-1469-297X
Available Date: 0000-00-00
Students' Perceptions of Fairness in Groupwork Assessment: Validity Evidence for Peer Assessment Fairness Instrument
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, v50 n1 p111-126 2025
Groupwork is a crucial aspect of work contexts and a key twenty first century skill. Assessment of groupwork provides a persistent challenge for educators in university contexts with students reporting experiences of unfairness from their peers during groupwork. This study developed a novel Peer Assessment Fairness Instrument to explore factors driving students' perceptions of fairness during groupwork processes. The results showed that students perceived fairness of groupwork in relation to (1) the grading outcomes they received (i.e. grade congruence), (2) the procedures based on which groups contributed to groupwork (i.e. performative group dynamics), and (3) the relationships based on which group members interacted (i.e. interpersonal treatment). The findings provide student-driven directions to promoting fairer peer assessments within groupwork contexts.
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes, College Faculty, Teamwork, 21st Century Skills, Cooperative Learning, Peer Relationship, Evaluation Methods, Scoring Rubrics, Evaluation Criteria, Student Evaluation, Performance Based Assessment, Test Validity, Test Reliability, Peer Evaluation, Ethics, Group Dynamics, Teacher Student Relationship, Student Participation
Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: United Kingdom
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: 1Learning Sciences and Assessment, National Institute of Education, Singapore, Singapore; 2Teaching and Learning Academy, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK; 3Centre for Innovation in Education, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; 4Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK; 5BPP University, London, UK