Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Elementary School Students | 3 |
Achievement Tests | 2 |
Benchmarking | 2 |
Predictive Validity | 2 |
Reading Tests | 2 |
Standardized Tests | 2 |
Validity | 2 |
Academic Discourse | 1 |
Academic Language | 1 |
At Risk Students | 1 |
Classification | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Assessment for Effective… | 3 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 3 |
Intermediate Grades | 2 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Stanford Achievement Tests | 3 |
Dynamic Indicators of Basic… | 1 |
Florida Comprehensive… | 1 |
Peabody Picture Vocabulary… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mooney, Paul; Lastrapes, Renée E. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2019
The purpose of the research was to replicate commonality analysis for two measures: critical content monitoring and sentence verification technique. Participants were 967 fourth-, fifth-, and sixth-grade students across seven public primary schools in a southeastern U.S. district. The predictor variables were administered as benchmarks 3 times in…
Descriptors: Validity, Elementary School Students, Science Tests, Reading Comprehension
Mooney, Paul; Lastrapes, Renée E. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2016
The amount of research evaluating the technical merits of general outcome measures of science and social studies achievement is growing. This study targeted criterion validity for critical content monitoring. Questions addressed the concurrent criterion validity of alternate presentation formats of critical content monitoring and the measure's…
Descriptors: Outcome Measures, Academic Discourse, Benchmarking, Social Studies
Johnson, Evelyn S.; Jenkins, Joseph R.; Petscher, Yaacov – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2010
In a response-to-intervention framework, schools typically employ a direct route approach to screening, in which students identified as at risk by a screening process are directly placed into intervention. Direct route approaches require screening decisions to be highly accurate, but few studies examining the predictive validity of reading…
Descriptors: Screening Tests, Reading Tests, At Risk Students, Predictive Validity