This article presents the argument presented by the author regarding the views of Baron and Galizio (2005), which provide an accurate and very clear version of the author's arguments against the use of the positive-negative reinforcement distinction in behavior analysis. Here, the author points out few things to add to Baron and Galizio's (2005) presentation on the positive-negative reinforcement distinction. These include: conditioned reinforcement as stimulus change, positive psychology, stock-maintained behavior, and textbook coverage.