Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Software | 2 |
| Computer Uses in Education | 2 |
| Feedback (Response) | 2 |
| Grading | 2 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Instruction | 1 |
| Computer Software Evaluation | 1 |
| Focus Groups | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| British Journal of… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkBuckley, Emily; Cowap, Lisa – British Journal of Educational Technology, 2013
The aim of this project was to pilot plagiarism detection software and online marking, evaluating its use with staff on a first year undergraduate module within the psychology department at a UK university. One hundred and sixty undergraduate psychology students submitted three assignments via Turnitin, and staff used the software to check for…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Psychology, Foreign Countries
Students' Response to Traditional and Computer-Assisted Formative Feedback: A Comparative Case Study
Denton, Philip; Madden, Judith; Roberts, Matthew; Rowe, Philip – British Journal of Educational Technology, 2008
The national movement towards progress files, incorporating personal development planning and reflective learning, is supported by lecturers providing effective feedback to their students. Recent technological advances mean that higher education tutors are no longer obliged to return comments in the "traditional" manner, by annotating…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Pharmaceutical Education, Computer Software, Likert Scales
