Peer versus Self Assessment of Oral Business Presentation Performance.

Campbell, Kim Sydow; Mothersbaugh, David L.; Brammer, Charlotte; Taylor, Timothy

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

Peer reviewed

ERIC Number: EJ632295

Record Type: Journal

Publication Date: 2001

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: ISSN-1080-5699

EISSN: N/A

Available Date: N/A

Peer versus Self Assessment of Oral Business Presentation Performance.

Campbell, Kim Sydow; Mothersbaugh, David L.; Brammer, Charlotte; Taylor, Timothy

Business Communication Quarterly, v64 n3 p23-42 Sep 2001

Examines self and peer ratings of oral business presentations in business classrooms. Finds that both holistic and analytical peer assessments are reasonable substitutes for instructor assessment when raters are trained; self assessment does not closely reflect either peer or instructor assessments; and peer assessment of delivery characteristics, command of material, and content strongly predict peer ratings of overall presentation quality. (SR)

Descriptors: Business Communication, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation, Public Speaking, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Student Evaluation

Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A

Author Affiliations: N/A