Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Reputation | 2 |
| Age Discrimination | 1 |
| Authors | 1 |
| Awards | 1 |
| Citations (References) | 1 |
| Doctoral Programs | 1 |
| Educational Quality | 1 |
| Expectation | 1 |
| Institutional Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Change | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedStanton, Domna C. – Change, 1981
A variety of issues associated with resistance to or necessity for author-anonymous reviewing of scholarly work are examined: sex, age, and even name stereotyping; tradition; institutionalization of egalitarianism; promotion of newer scholars; and power politics. (MSE)
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, Authors, Evaluation Methods, Expectation
Peer reviewedDiamond, Nancy; Graham, Hugh Davis – Change, 2000
Discusses, in the context of the National Research Council's next study of research-doctorate programs, arguments over continuing use of reputational surveys as the primary measure of program quality, as opposed to more objective measures of research performance. Eleven tables rank institutions for specific fields by reputation, citation density,…
Descriptors: Awards, Citations (References), Doctoral Programs, Educational Quality
