NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 15 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pruden, Shannon M.; Roseberry, Sarah; Goksun, Tilbe; Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy; Golinkoff, Roberta M. – Child Development, 2013
Fundamental to amassing a lexicon of relational terms (i.e., verbs, prepositions) is the ability to abstract and categorize spatial relations such as a figure (e.g., "boy") moving along a path (e.g., "around" the barn). Three studies examine how infants learn to categorize path over changes in "manner," or how an action is performed (e.g., running…
Descriptors: Infants, Classification, English, Language Acquisition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sherman, Tracy – Child Development, 1985
Infants exposed to a set of artificially-created face stimuli having distinct mean and modal prototypes showed a pattern of behavior predicted by category abstraction models. Infants appeared to abstract, at the time of learning, a feature-count summary of the category displayed. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Ability, Infants, Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Younger, Barbara A. – Child Development, 1985
Two experiments investigated infants' use of structural relations in dividing schematic drawings of animals into categories. Results demonstrated subjects' sensitivity to structural information like that thought by Rosch (1978) to exist in the natural world and their ability to segregate items into categories on the basis of clusters of correlated…
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Ability, Infants, Recognition (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mareschal, Denis; Tan, Seok Hui – Child Development, 2007
One hundred 18-month-olds were tested using sequential touching and following 4 different priming contexts using sets of toys that could be simultaneously categorized at either the basic or global level. An exact expression of the expected mean sequence length for arbitrary categories was derived as a function of the number of touches made, and a…
Descriptors: Infants, Classification, Tactual Perception, Child Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Corrigan, Roberta; Schommer, Marlene – Child Development, 1984
Two experiments assessed the importance of form versus function in 2-year-old infants' categorizations. Nonsense objects were constructed to independently vary form and function. Adults differentially directed subjects' attention to one or the other stimulus dimension. It was hypothesized that children's conceptualizations would vary as a function…
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Ability, Infant Behavior, Infants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vosniadou, Stella; Ortony, Andrew – Child Development, 1983
Adults and children three, four, five, and six years of age were asked to complete statements by choosing a word from the following word pair alternatives: metaphorical/literal, literal/anomalous, and metaphorical/anomalous. A categorization task was used to determine how subjects viewed relationships among items. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Classification, Cognitive Ability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tager-Flusberg, Helen – Child Development, 1985
Findings suggest that semantic knowledge for concrete objects is represented and organized in similar ways in autistic, retarded, and normal children. Previous findings on cognitive deficits in autistic children are more likely related to their inability to use cognitive representations in an appropriate and flexible manner. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Autism, Classification, Cognitive Ability, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hupp, Susan C.; Mervis, Carolyn B. – Child Development, 1982
Undertaken within the framework of the best example theory of categorization, this study investigates category acquisition as a function of initial exposure to only good exemplars and as a function of exposure to single as opposed to multiple exemplars. Six severely handicapped children, ranging in age from 8 to 18 years, participated. (Author/MP)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Children, Classification, Cognitive Ability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Linda B.; And Others – Child Development, 1986
Examines how reference points for the categorical interpretation of high and low (adjectives) were defined by three- to five-year-old children and adults. Shows categorical interpretations of relative terms to be complex dependent. (HOD)
Descriptors: Adjectives, Adults, Classification, Cognitive Ability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Merriman, William E. – Child Development, 1986
Evaluates some possible reasons for the occurrence and eventual correction of children's naming errors in an experiment in which two-, four-, and six-year-olds learned two artificial object names in succession. (HOD)
Descriptors: Child Development, Classification, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
White, Kathleen M. – Child Development, 1971
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Age Differences, Classification, Cognitive Ability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mix, Kelly S.; And Others – Child Development, 1996
Investigated the ability of three- and four-year-old children to perform tasks which require matching sets of sounds to numerically equivalent visual displays. Findings indicated that three-year-olds performed at the level of chance on the auditory-visual matching task, but four-year-olds performed significantly above chance. (MOK)
Descriptors: Acoustics, Classification, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lillard, Angeline S. – Child Development, 1996
Five experiments investigated whether children, ages three to eight, think of pretending as a mental state. Results indicated that most children under six see pretending as primarily physical. Eight-year-olds claimed that execution of pretense did not involve the mind, although the planning aspect of pretense did. (MOK)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Classification, Cognitive Ability, Concept Formation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Miller, Leon K.; Barg, M. D. – Child Development, 1982
In a series of experiments, young children were asked to compare the quantities of classes of objects under two conditions: (1) when one of the classes of objects is a subordinate of the other (the traditional class-inclusion problem), and (2) when the terms refer to exclusive sets but different levels of generality. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Development, Context Effect
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hodges, Rosemary M.; French, Lucia A. – Child Development, 1988
Assessing Markman's hypothesis that the organizational principles underlying collection concepts facilitate children's performance on cognitive tasks requiring part-whole comparisons, three experiments indicated that the facilitative effect of collection labels appears to be specific to the class-inclusion task. Results suggest that Markman's…
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Ability, Conservation (Concept), Early Childhood Education