Descriptor
| Abstract Reasoning | 1 |
| Cognitive Development | 1 |
| Cognitive Style | 1 |
| Cooperation | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Interpersonal Relationship | 1 |
| Logical Thinking | 1 |
| Problem Solving | 1 |
| Young Children | 1 |
Source
| Child Development | 1 |
Author
| Russell, James | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedRussell, James – Child Development, 1981
The aims of this study were (1) to test the dyadic superiority hypothesis by comparing dyadic performance on a logical reasoning task with the performance of children working alone, and (2) to determine whether the incorrect child's compliance with the correct child was a major factor in the dyadic production of correct answers. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Style, Cooperation
