NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jarman, Ronald F. – Child Development, 1979
Techniques of presenting information temporally in the auditory and visual modalities and spatially in the visual modality were used to assess information processing in seven- and nine-year-old children. (JMB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rosinski, Richard R. – Child Development, 1977
Analysis of the performance of second-, fourth-, sixth-grade, and college-level subjects on picture-word interference tasks indicated that distractor words belonging to the same semantic category as pictures produced more interference than either unrelated words or nonsense trigrams. (Author/JMB)
Descriptors: College Students, Elementary School Students, Interference (Language), Learning Modalities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Foellinger, David B.; Trabasso, Tom – Child Development, 1977
The ability to recall and organize actions was studied in a sample of 80 children ranging in age from 5 to 11 years. Eight different auditory or visual commands were successively presented for 10 trials in each modality in a free-recall task. (Author/JMB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Auditory Stimuli, Elementary School Students, Learning Modalities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Spitzer, Tam M. – Child Development, 1976
A total of 120 children (aged 5, 9 and 11 years old) performed a spatial recall task utilizing either visual or auditory items. Results showed that visual recall was significantly superior to auditory recall at all age levels and all serial positions regardless of cue modality. (Author/JMB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Auditory Stimuli, Cues, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Odom, Richard D.; Corbin, David W. – Child Development, 1973
Uni- and multidimensional processing of 6- to 9-year olds was studied using recall tasks in which an array of stimuli was reconstructed to match a model array. Results indicated that both age groups were able to solve multidimensional problems, but that solution rate was retarded by the unidimensional processing of highly salient dimensions.…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Dimensional Preference, Elementary School Students, Information Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pezdek, Kathy – Child Development, 1980
Examines life-span developmental differences in spontaneous integration of semantically relevant material presented in pictures and sentences. Elementary school students, high school students, and adults were tested. (Author/SS)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Comprehension, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blank, Marion; And Others – Child Development, 1975
Intra- and crossmodal performance of normal and retarded third-grade readers were compared in a reaction-time task. Results suggest that the demands of stimulus complexity within the visual modality rather than the demands of crossmodal shifting were related to reading ability. (Author/ED)
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Difficulty Level, Elementary School Students, Learning Modalities