Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Learning Disabilities | 4 |
| Memory | 4 |
| Age Differences | 3 |
| Children | 2 |
| Visual Stimuli | 2 |
| Aptitude Tests | 1 |
| Attention Deficit Disorders | 1 |
| Child Development | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Conceptual Tempo | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Child Development | 4 |
Author
| Byrd-Craven, Jennifer | 1 |
| Geary, David C. | 1 |
| Hoard, Mary K. | 1 |
| Howe, Mark L. | 1 |
| Nugent, Lara | 1 |
| Numtee, Chattavee | 1 |
| Ryan, Ellen B. | 1 |
| Siegel, Linda S. | 1 |
| Swanson, H. Lee | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSwanson, H. Lee – Child Development, 1977
A serial recognition task was used to compare performance of two age groups of learning disabled children (mean chronological ages 8.1 and 10.6) with 2- and 3-dimensional representations of nonlabeled 8-point random shapes. (Author/JMB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Elementary Education, Learning Disabilities, Memory
Geary, David C.; Hoard, Mary K.; Byrd-Craven, Jennifer; Nugent, Lara; Numtee, Chattavee – Child Development, 2007
Using strict and lenient mathematics achievement cutoff scores to define a learning disability, respective groups of children who are math disabled (MLD, n = 15) and low achieving (LA, n = 44) were identified. These groups and a group of typically achieving (TA, n = 46) children were administered a battery of mathematical cognition, working…
Descriptors: Memory, Mathematics Achievement, Learning Disabilities, Disability Identification
Peer reviewedSiegel, Linda S.; Ryan, Ellen B. – Child Development, 1989
Compares the development of working memory in normally achieving children and learning disabled children. Results show a growth of working memory as a function of age. Deficits in working memory for subtypes of learning disabled children are discussed. (RJC)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attention Deficit Disorders, Child Development, Children
Peer reviewedHowe, Mark L.; And Others – Child Development, 1985
A stages-of-learning model was used to examine effects of picture-word manipulation on storage and retrieval differences between disabled and nondisabled grade 2 and 6 children. Results showed that disabled students are poorer at memory tasks and in developing the ability to reliably retrieve information than nondisabled children. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Learning Disabilities

Direct link
