Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Children | 6 |
Inferences | 6 |
Logical Thinking | 4 |
Age Differences | 3 |
Number Concepts | 3 |
Adults | 2 |
Cognitive Development | 2 |
Computation | 2 |
Learning Processes | 2 |
Learning Strategies | 2 |
Numbers | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Cognition | 6 |
Author
Asmuth, Jennifer | 2 |
Bloomfield, Amber | 2 |
Rips, Lance J. | 2 |
Gelman, Susan A. | 1 |
Heyman, Gail D. | 1 |
Kalish, Charles W. | 1 |
Laurence, Stephen | 1 |
Margolis, Eric | 1 |
Noveck, Ira A. | 1 |
Phillips, Ann T. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rips, Lance J.; Asmuth, Jennifer; Bloomfield, Amber – Cognition, 2008
According to one theory about how children learn the meaning of the words for the positive integers, they first learn that "one," "two," and "three" stand for appropriately sized sets. They then conclude by inductive inference that the next numeral in the count sequence denotes the size of sets containing one more object than the size denoted by…
Descriptors: Learning Strategies, Logical Thinking, Number Concepts, Inferences
Margolis, Eric; Laurence, Stephen – Cognition, 2008
Theories of number concepts often suppose that the natural numbers are acquired as children learn to count and as they draw an induction based on their interpretation of the first few count words. In a bold critique of this general approach, Rips, Asmuth, Bloomfield [Rips, L., Asmuth, J. & Bloomfield, A. (2006). Giving the boot to the bootstrap:…
Descriptors: Numbers, Learning Strategies, Number Concepts, Inferences
Rips, Lance J.; Asmuth, Jennifer; Bloomfield, Amber – Cognition, 2006
According to one theory about how children learn the concept of natural numbers, they first determine that "one", "two", and "three" denote the size of sets containing the relevant number of items. They then make the following inductive inference (the Bootstrap): The next number word in the counting series denotes the size of the sets you get by…
Descriptors: Numbers, Number Concepts, Inferences, Computation

Heyman, Gail D.; Phillips, Ann T.; Gelman, Susan A. – Cognition, 2003
Examined reasoning about physics principles within and across ontological kinds among 5- and 7-year-olds and adults. Found that all age groups tended to appropriately generalize what they learned across ontological kinds. Children assumed that principles learned with reference to one ontological kind were more likely to apply within that kind than…
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Children, Cognitive Development

Noveck, Ira A. – Cognition, 2001
Three experiments examined understanding of scalar implicature, specifically understanding that use of a term (e.g., some) indicates the speaker had reasons not to use a more informative term (e.g., all). Results reveal consistent ordering in which representations of weak scalar terms tend to be treated logically by young competent participants…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Child Development, Children, Communication Skills

Kalish, Charles W. – Cognition, 2002
Three experiments explored the conditions under which inductive inferences about people were made by children and adults. Results indicated that children often predicted that people would behave differently in the future than they did in the past. Younger children limited predictions of consistency to non-psychological events. Older children…
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Attribution Theory, Behavior Patterns