Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Data Analysis | 2 |
Language Processing | 2 |
Adults | 1 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Children | 1 |
Cognitive Development | 1 |
Computational Linguistics | 1 |
Error Correction | 1 |
Evidence | 1 |
Experimental Psychology | 1 |
Identification | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Cognition | 2 |
Author
Ambridge, Ben | 1 |
Chang, Franklin | 1 |
Indefrey, Peter | 1 |
Kita, Sotaro | 1 |
Lieven, Elena V. M. | 1 |
Pine, Julian M. | 1 |
Rowland, Caroline F. | 1 |
Seyfeddinipur, Mandana | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 1 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rowland, Caroline F.; Chang, Franklin; Ambridge, Ben; Pine, Julian M.; Lieven, Elena V. M. – Cognition, 2012
Structural priming paradigms have been influential in shaping theories of adult sentence processing and theories of syntactic development. However, until recently there have been few attempts to provide an integrated account that explains both adult and developmental data. The aim of the present paper was to begin the process of integration by…
Descriptors: Priming, Evidence, Sentences, Verbs
Seyfeddinipur, Mandana; Kita, Sotaro; Indefrey, Peter – Cognition, 2008
When speakers detect a problem in what they are saying, they must decide whether or not to interrupt themselves and repair the problem, and if so, when. Speakers will maximize accuracy if they interrupt themselves as soon as they detect a problem, but they will maximize fluency if they go on speaking until they are ready to produce the repair.…
Descriptors: Speech Communication, Maintenance, Computational Linguistics, Language Fluency