Descriptor
| Deep Structure | 4 |
| Syntax | 4 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Language Rhythm | 2 |
| Linguistic Theory | 2 |
| Sentence Structure | 2 |
| Surface Structure | 2 |
| Case (Grammar) | 1 |
| Child Language | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Communicative Competence… | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognition | 4 |
Author
| Delis, Dean | 1 |
| Erreich, Anne | 1 |
| Ford, Marilyn | 1 |
| Holmes, Virginia M. | 1 |
| Slater, Anne Saxon | 1 |
| Sorensen, John M. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedFord, Marilyn; Holmes, Virginia M. – Cognition, 1978
An experiment was conducted to determine whether the deep structure or the surface structure clause is more important as a speech planning unit, and whether syntactic decisions are made during sentence production. Results were discussed in relation to previous studies of pausing and speech disruption. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Deep Structure, Foreign Countries, Language Rhythm
Peer reviewedSorensen, John M.; And Others – Cognition, 1978
Five experiments examined how the duration of a word spoken in a sentence is influenced by the grammatical category to which it belongs, and the position of the word in a constituent. The findings indicated that a binary distinction between major and minor categories is sufficient for a theory of speech timing and synthesis. (Author/JAC)
Descriptors: Case (Grammar), Deep Structure, Form Classes (Languages), Higher Education
Peer reviewedDelis, Dean; Slater, Anne Saxon – Cognition, 1977
The theory that reduction transformations provide speakers with the option of deleting redundant information when communicating to a topic-cognizant audience is supported. In the experiment, college physiology students were provided with deep structure proximal sentences (base propositions), and asked to communicate them to different audiences,…
Descriptors: Communicative Competence (Languages), Deep Structure, Higher Education, Linguistic Theory
Peer reviewedErreich, Anne; And Others – Cognition, 1979
Goodluck and Solan (EJ 205 641) presented alternative formulations about why errors predicted by basic operations fail to occur and suggested a refined hypothesis. Each aspect of their argument is addressed, and it is concluded that descriptive power, methodology and principles for restricting error predictions favor our original analysis. (RD)
Descriptors: Child Language, Deep Structure, Error Analysis (Language), Grammar


