Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Moral Values | 2 |
| Psychological Patterns | 2 |
| Value Judgment | 2 |
| Auditory Stimuli | 1 |
| Crime | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Experiments | 1 |
| Food | 1 |
| Human Body | 1 |
| Influences | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognition | 2 |
Author
| Bauml, Karl-Heinz T. | 1 |
| Gleixner, Sabine | 1 |
| Neuhauser, Theresa | 1 |
| Pastotter, Bernhard | 1 |
| Prinz, Jesse | 1 |
| Seidel, Angelika | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPastotter, Bernhard; Gleixner, Sabine; Neuhauser, Theresa; Bauml, Karl-Heinz T. – Cognition, 2013
People's moods can influence moral judgment. Such influences may arise because moods affect moral emotion, or because moods affect moral thought. The present study provides evidence that, at least in the footbridge dilemma, moods affect moral thought. The results of two experiments are reported in which, after induction of positive, negative, or…
Descriptors: Psychological Patterns, Value Judgment, Decision Making, Moral Values
Seidel, Angelika; Prinz, Jesse – Cognition, 2013
Theoretical models and correlational research suggest that anger and disgust play different roles in moral judgment. Anger is theorized to underlie reactions to crimes against persons, such as battery and unfairness, and disgust is theorized to underlie reactions to crimes against nature, such as sexual transgressions and cannibalism. To date,…
Descriptors: Moral Values, Value Judgment, Models, Negative Attitudes
